agm | Brightlingsea Chat | Forum


Before you post in our forums, please make sure you read the Forum Rules


Please consider registering

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —

— Match —

— Forum Options —

Minimum search word length is 3 characters – maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
August 10, 2014
3:19 pm
mr interesting

Well after taking a few days to think about it i still believe my team was short changed over a replacement player,it was constantly stated we had four players we could call on to play ,this was patently untrue ,since all the discussions took place after xmas, at least two of those players were in,eligble (in their own words at AGM) due to not having played before xmas ,surely the committee knew this fact . So why did they keep stating we had four players available to us .when clearly we did,n’t and as a result a wrong decision was made . I  realise  that because it,s me making a complaint nobody will care to much but i believe we are owed an apology , as we were let down by a ruling that was not based on fact and other people were misled as to the facts.

Forum Timezone: Europe/London

Most Users Ever Online: 35

Currently Online:
13 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Chrisw: 5

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 65

Members: 2681

Moderators: 1

Admins: 2

Forum Stats:

Groups: 9

Forums: 31

Topics: 837

Posts: 1895

Newest Members:

Premiumyrs, Fortressfwy, Marshallirt, Minelabcab, Drywallrnm, Boschftn, Pouringiyo, Clamcasezrb, Drywallpsk, Vitamixwja

Moderators: clingard_1: 150

Administrators: Mr Pools: 2146, John Daking: 179